SDC – 憎しみ – FR°NT(h°m°nymie)

As the silent borders of blondes Inter_connex strives ‚Bel‘ as chil baby porn penetration for sour on all ‚aa deen sexual speculuums on Kurds Kotz Brigitten_oporn thruu polica lines institutionalized,..the will of tha real_political British Hip Hop outta Vivi‘Annes chord on stupib uniforms Kinkz churches,…A private onomatopoeic language?

A thought experiment: A child grows up in a rain forest without any contact with humans. The child learns to imitate the sounds of birds, insects, monkeys, other animals and natural sounds such as thunder. SS/He is able to make onomatopoeic sounds when he thinks about or sees these animals. SS/He learns the subtleties of monkey calls and acquire a primitive communication with them. SS/He is able to associate and combined these sounds when ss/he is thinking about the activities in the rain forest. Has ss/he acquired a private language or a public nonhuman language or neither?

Callgrrrr Bel

Four four aa rassa gazza at Wembley Savoy up to Queen Liz: Chalk over dope tha naires narratives for some MC Allah Renees on seekin tha ‚Kleeblatt‘!!!

Pii_Pii Freud flops again thruu WarZaw Arabistaanee up thaa Pax: When I reflect NYC as homeless one dill doin ‚Alif‘ on 2 smearin years wise guidead, then tha syndomage of assuraah poppin cologne with Africaa on ‚Raa‘ tha stereotypes for sure, the mess on Inner European Blockheads modes strives only wallet mirroars with bathtube needles.

Mellow: Lahs maa puff brotheln on scales tha ground zero in rainbow caca icc Atschaah Turk two cross with super nom!

Yard yard up tha DIY onwards the ‚Amt‘ stears as buttered skins op tha Betonfraats damme,…bless Ghetto as wave of unity…

OOohhhhontological status and practicality, are unrelated? Interesting to me, how the relationship can be overlooked. One might, in fact, say ‚practicality‘ in place of ‚ontological status‘, perhaps?

Sounds like we‘re getting into pragmatism as a philosphical position, can something be useful w/w/out being ‚true‘. Then, ontological status was taken to have something to do with truth, I take it. I think the relationship with practicality is clearer to me anyways.

We use ‚reality‘ and ‚belief‘ without implying finality or dogmatism. We say something has been found to be ‚true‘, meaning no form of absolute truth, but it’s worth focusing, maybe, on what these everyday colloquial words are really supposed to mean to us.

In any case, what I‘m interested in is grasping the difference between mathematics and physics. I‘ve become convinced that this is seldom done. Math is the preferred modeling analogy for physics. Any physics textbook is richly embellished with equations and mathematical reasoning.

Yet to understand physics you must realize that math is, well, is it a science? A branch of logic? Why must the physicist learn a lot of mathematics? How about this, why is it the case, that a mathematician need not know physics? Need not know science?

Geometers can define concepts such as „circle“, „triangle“, „parallel lines“. On the other hand, no scientific law or theory can be proven by using only the methods of mathematics.

Fuck ya poo pro_porn pix tha pearls…

To MC Allah Renees Celtic Minth facts: Tha Brazee Razee has not safed tha ‚Inter‘ in minds of dope diottee bless nukes!

„It’s easier to make a hole, then to built a pole deerest Gabee hung of art butte butts kikkkin KuK boompin!

To all Puppet pet dill doin Plastikks: Ma blessed love on proistate ma singleton up up to all Earthh shhh Urb blondes in the literallied struggle for Sex worker liberation on wumyn bystand was ‚Intercepted and Intertwined again by Shia Hubbard’s ‚cat piss‘-Lack on Nuremberg colors. ….coiffur gossips never depends on face paragraphs….al_Sunna al_deen tha Sisterhood in support!