…join the Greek’ski in the ss_killz from L.A. He>Art_core…the riots will continue.
My CoCo adjourner of PiTT’s [PS]: That the Mahdis cross cover being every Muham_Mad as one of 99′pillars the religion of money and food could afford, the laughter about my reconciliation with my patrilinearity and the Arabic Iron Mountain ‚zamel‘ Inc. will deploy the re_surrect_Ion as love for dark and A‘____Ones.
Should the SS_ORG and other ’secret headphones‘ still be Abu Bakr and Umar,…but the laughter hurts and my blood on the clitoris of al-Lat is the absence the love Heartcore as ideal of all that shit a quarter could have being never a Pagan or _Ism one.
Salaam and Shalom libertad! No‘lympix will be on this summer of mindset rage.
Babe,… thanx for the nipple screwdriver, that’s remind me of something I forget every time zone again,…We are disposed to assume that our sentences may possess conditions of truth transcending the conditions of assertibility which our recognitional capacities are capable of disclosing to us.
Would you agree that this means that a scientific model of language could describe all the relevant observable phenomena while nonetheless failing to capture these truth conditions? That is, could a scientist who concerns himself with the observable phenomena of linguistic communication (e.g. what is asserted under what conditions and what effect those assertions have on others) produce a model of semantics which ignores the truth conditions you assume to be vital?
(By way of background, I‘m a cognitive scientist currently working on distributional models of semantics, which eschew the truth conditional approach in favour of a usage based approach.)
Peace to all sistaz !!
I‘ll refrain the Neo_cross_multiplication with the lamebrain that all left_autonomous Bi_sex identities used the framed work on [anim_]al-Qaeda as networked white dog hunted: I loved that nipple screw drive!