Archiv für Oktober 2012

For the Frankenstorm victimz -some on weather underground radios!

As the mentioned ongoin filth of the speech dee votes has in common for a plurhaal interpretation the lysis has narrated as theory of kin friendship, the Union beAph of too squat has the tri_ball_Ism a bash against homo_nationalism by all filthee deficits.

Well based on Quantum mechanics, there can be multiple possibilities of every decision or event. However, I think that people over-apply this to everything. For example, when you flip a coin. Some may think that the outcome of the coin flip is decided only when it lands on one side or the other. However, based on the laws of physics, the outcome is predetermined the moment you release the coin from your hand, by its velocity, spin, and launch position. Therefore a coin flip is deterministic, it only appears probabilistic because the initial conditions to produce either a heads or tails is equally likely, so in a perfect situation, reproducing the initial conditions of a coin flip would result in it landing on the same side every time. By varying the technique of tossing the coin, you are adding randomness to the coin toss that is independent of the mechanics of the coin toss itself. The only common variable in these matters is the mind. What determines how our hand launches the coin? Do we have any free-will? Or is it merely the work of chemicals in your brain activating in the right order? What I am asking is, are our decisions and thoughts predetermined by biology and the laws of physics, or do we actually have the ability to shape our decisions? Are choices merely an illusion?

Obviously, creatures are finite…the same is not necessarily true for the universe at large.

The mainly diagnostic approach of the critical theorists of the 1940s did not complete—and could not have been expected to complete—the task of analyzing the problems of capitalism and its culture. Just as one hundred years earlier, Karl Marx’s work did not and could not complete that very same task. This is not because of faults in The Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 or the Dialectic of Enlightenment of 1944, to mention two examples…anee[male] qaeda for left radicali interventions….

Very simply, capitalism’s operational logic is the same, but its organizational mode is changing. Same as femme’s militant aesthetics for victimized the sun… In the spirit of the set-up above, I shall now address the question of „What is to be done?“ However, I want to rephrase the question as „Who should do what?“ And, to be fair to this line of questioning, it is not always a disingenuous quip against theory. Most radical critics of capitalism want a theory of praxis of some kind, even if their idea of revolution is more Foucauldian than Marxist.

Yes, I get that, but it is simple consequence of bringing determinism to it’s fullest conclusions.
And thus far you have simply rejected that this is the case off hand, without any illustration of substance of your refutations.
I could restate my line of reasoning repeatedly…and you can continue to claim it is radical…but that will get us no where.

Maybe you could start a new thread about evolution and determinism?

It is also critical to emphasize that the „results“ of the popular insurrection in Egypt have been overemphasized by too many observers around the world. Critics of the uprising continually ask what’s next, worrying about the Muslim Brotherhood and Sharia law. Supporters, on the other hand pointed the prohID back as tri_ball_Ism…Um actually that is not my assumption, that is a general outline made by the theory.

That an adaptation will only be selected, as the result of utility, which essentially serves to grant an advantage to survival.

Take sophisticats example of „neutral traits“…we would only consent that they are neutral if.

1) the ecological niche of these creatures have predators and prey that can detect fur coloration

2) that domestication is a natural control group rather than a form of artificial selection

Anyway, like I stated before, I tend to regard evolution as a refutation of determinism, or causal fatalism at least, because the theory expects that variation is the result of non-deterministic randomness…even if natural selection is a process that is not completely random.

Bel . for a beer at postfascist Hamburg’s 1987 ‚Barrikaden_Tage‘ at the Hafenstr….votes!

An eve with post-Boy George…

den ollen BuBen core through the ‚xXx‘…

The soul cannot be conscious without the body. It is independent of the body in the sense that it is immortal, though not completely functional. It is dependent on the body in the sense that it requires the body to continue to be conscious in the physical world. Are emotions really caused by brain chemistry? If that were true, would there by any sense in the meaning of human? When I am emotionally moved, I feel something more than physical within me. How do you know that things such as love, joy, and sadness exist? Human expressions are said to be signs of it, but if these concepts were truly physical, we would be able to fully distinguish them from mere smiles and chemicals.

Ani[male] Qaeda! – soDomee blind of the _Ism of post_men’ss_Thrual femmes history!

B.E.L. – the whore of carneval work! Any patronas out for sure Q bii Eye beAph!

Salaam Capichee! Respect to all fathers in the global commune in – Cops out MoD!

EDL was a rose debate!

One love B.E.L. with FeuilleTones! [censored by Psy_gans in Rome}}

Gypseal Gyptee Antifascist

24th Nov we celebrate 5 years of International coordination

At first a greater pHuck ya to white – hetero left radicals on their abusement of newbies add Universities autumn pet_ethics begins. New sex flavor no one is interested in. And then the scale on Britcore Hip Hop in postfascist Hamburg/Europe, we as SDC have abandoned the frames through a newer huge of International communication ‚the commune in‘ – ‚Cops out‘ – modes.

On Nov. 24th we‘ll celebrate the isLame bii-day bash of MC Gato and two others, and a lot of new stuff from Brits islands to the plateaus of HeArt/Def_core en francaise…with some joint ventures to Crustpunk.

The location is now open sourced and will be announced soon.



At their worst, Adorno and Horkheimer’s account of identity thinking is blandly reductive: “All [that self-determination] means [in German idealism] is that the work my master formerly ordered me to do is the same as the work I now seek to carry out of my own free will”; Kant’s “transcendental apperception: labor made absolute” . And speaking of exchange value: “People like advertisements. They do what the ads tell them and they know that they are doing so”. Along this sweeping line of thought Horkheimer remarks that “The USA is the country of argument.” Adorno picks up the (banal) idea: “Argument is consistently bourgeois”. Adorno goes on to confuse the matter when he also insists that the “mistrust of argument is at bottom what has inspired the Husserls and Heideggers” and their fall into “pure irrationalism”.

Like other forms of anti-Semitism, left-wing anti-Semitism has survived by mutating; whereas once the Jewish/aRAP question (or problem) was viewed through the prism of economics, now it belongs to the realm of politics. The orthodox Marxist notion that the Jews/aRAPs – as an economic agent – perform a distinctive function within a system designed for the extraction of surplus value has been replaced by the anticolonialist notion that the Jews/aRAPs – as a national collective – are integral to the maintenance of Northern American hegemony on a global level.
Accordingly, there has been a conceptual shift on the Left from the politics of class to the politics of identity; and, again accordingly, a practical alignment with those forces, most notably the Islamist movements, opposed to this hegemony.

After the Taleban founding 1994 – my first poem about Arabic One att 1996

السلام عليكم


Grant me the strength to look at you, to bear the radiance
of the sun;
the strength to alert far away ships by my drumbeats,
to be a pearl diver,
to drive a toy-train,
to survive a famine
to extract the magic portion from the tresses
of the enfant femme.

Grant me, once more, an illusion.

And thought I am no Socrates,
grant me the vision to hear, to swim
in currents of the landscapes of French poets…

I have declined

I have hoisted my sail
To triumph over the tempest
And to content with unpredictable gades

My destiny is the quest for the unknown I will never again fear ghost or ghoul
For I am empowered with a zeal to explore the

I press forward
With the fresh power of tenacity and

I will not fear those gory thorns
I will not shrink from the battle
Though teaming with phobia and death
So long as the battle will restore me to life
These are my oars.

I begin to row in the midst of the sea
And to find my direction
There beyond the unfathom_able depths
The inner voice is calling me
„Why be afrai?“
You have a compass in your confidence


Written at the first Arabic course Oct.1996 at the Oriental Institute on Islamic Science by Prof. Abdulghafour Sabuni…