NS-Luth patent use/utilith Registry N°.-alibaba.com/product-gs/370441286/cockring.html Sparta

Welcom in the land of ‚copy and pest‘.--

http://ancyouthleague.org/ *~|Freundshaft||*~http://1salope.info/1104-147-clara/

Postmodernism and Cultural Theories (Chinese: 后现代主义与文化理论; pinyin: Hòuxiàndàizhǔyì yǔ wénhuà lǐlùn). Tr. Tang Xiaobing. Xi‘an: Shaanxi Normal University Press. 1987.

Nationalism, Colonialism, and Literature, Derry: Field Day, 1988. A collection of three Field Day Pamphlets by Fredric Jameson, Terry Eagleton and Edward Said.

Late Marxism: Adorno, or, The Persistence of the Dialectic. London & New York: Verso. 1990.

Signatures of the Visible. New York & London: Routledge. 1990.

Postmodernism or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. 1991.

e||ef. The Archaeology of Knowledge….

‚Mr. and Ms. A.Urban Mohamad Saleem doost.-‘

Foucault followed the Order of Things with his Archaeology of Knowledge, which was published in 1969. In this work, Foucault tries to consolidate the method of archaeology: it is the only one of Foucault’s major works that does not comprise an historical study, and thus his most theoretical work. It is the most influential work of Foucault’s in literary criticism and some other applied areas.

Archaeology, Foucault now declares, means approaching language in a way that does not refer to a subject who transcends it – though he acknowledges he has not been rigorous enough in this respect in the past. That is not to say that Foucault is making a strong metaphysical claim about subjectivity, but rather only that he is proposing a mode of analysis that subordinates the role of the subject. Foucault in fact proposes to suspend acceptance not only of the notion of a subject who produces discourse but of all generally accepted discursive unities, such as the book. Instead, he wants to look only at the surface level of what is said, rather than to try to interpret language in terms of what stands behind it, be that hidden meaning, structures, or subjects. Foucault’s suggestion is to look at language in terms of discrete linguistic events, which he calls “statements,” such as to understand the multitudinous ways in which statements relate to one another. Foucault’s statement is not defined by content (a statement is not a proposition), nor by its simple materiality (the sounds made, the marks on paper). The specificity of a statement is rather determined both by such intrinsic properties and by its extrinsic relations, by context as well as content.