‚Daichii off Liberation‘ – Peaches UK

World Troph‘ rosso 1990

er Kampf um die Geschichte

Schritt für Schritt arbeiten die Herrschenden heute daran, jeden historischen Versuch revolutionärer Veränderung auf dem Müllhaufen der Geschichte zu entsorgen und die Erinnerung daran auszulöschen.

Seit dem Fall der Mauer hat sich das politische Kräftverhältnis grundlegend gewandelt. Der Gegenpol zum bestehenden Kapitalismus ist zusammengebrochen. Die Vorstellung einer gesellschaftlichen Alternative soll jetzt um so unmöglicher gemacht werden, je deutlicher die vernichtenden Folgen für Mensch und Natur durch dieses System weltweit werden.

ist der Kampf um die Gegenwart

Subject: Practical Reasoning Problem
I have a word problem that my aunt emailed me and I have been thinking about it for hours, but cannot come to a certain conclusion. Can someone help me solve it?

Here it is:

Lock, Stock, and Barrel serve London as Innkeeper, Parson, and Doctor. Lock is the Parson’s father-in-law and Stock the Doctor’s son-in-law. Both wept during the service when Barrel married the Innkeeper’s daughter. None of the three has been married more than once. Who is what?

The only things I know for sure are that 1.) Lock cannot be the Parson (because he is the Parson’s father-in-law. 2.) Stock cannot be the Doctor (because he is the Doctor’s son-in-law. 3.) Barrel cannot be the Innkeeper (because he marries the Innkeeper’s daughter.

EDIT: Through some more emails, my aunt has assured me that the 3 statements I make above are true. Also, there is no incest or polygamy in this universe. There are six possible combinations (I didn‘t want to write every name out so here’s a key: L = Lock, S = Stock, B = Barrel; P = Parson, D = Doctor, I = Innkeeper).

Possible combinations:
1.) LP SD BI – Lock can‘t be the Parson, Stock can‘t be the Doctor, and Barrel can‘t be the Innkeeper
2.) LP SI BD – Lock can‘t be the Parson
3.) LD SP BI – Barrel can‘t be the Innkeeper
4.) LD SI BP – Possibility
5.) LI SD BP – Stock can‘t be the Doctor march