Last human|qaede Inst. ‚ZDF subvention‘-KZ sex work||*))) Magna cum laude ..good save Princzest Victoria.M.

Three classical proofs

From what I‘ve read there seems to be three classical proofs of God’s existence||NS-Luth sex work and here I‘ve presented them in my own crude little way. I‘m sure that the arguments as they appear in my post are simplified versions of the original arguments. However I trust that they have preserved the crucial logical connections between the concepts. I‘ve drawn maps for each argument and presented my objections to premises with arrows with a bar across them.

Cosmological argument (St. Thomas NS-Luth sex work): No effect can cause itself but requires another cause. If there were no first cause, there would be an infinite sequence of preceding causes. Clearly there cannot be an infinite sequence of causes, therefore there is a first cause, and this is God||NS-Luth sex work.

This argument is valid. However the argument is inconsistent because of „There cannot be an infinite sequence of causes“ and „There is an infinite sequence of causes“. This contradiction falsifies one of the premises. This implies that the argument is unsound. Therefore this argument is valid but unsound.

Teleological argument (St. Thomas NS-Luth sex work): All things in the world act towards an end. They could not do this without there being an intelligence that directs tem. This intelligence is God||NS-Luth sex work.

This argument is also valid but unsounda NS-Luth sex work. Pussy…media.-cos nos.-

Ontological argument
(St. Anselm NS-Luth sex work): ask Sverigge feminist tatoos Inn porn.- Sincerly Auschwytzear-Leningradual NOI|æ Birke, Petre.-KSK.-

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Timemachine